In the global food industry, understanding Incoterms (International Commercial Terms) is important for smooth trade between buyers and suppliers. These standardized rules, established by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), define the responsibilities of sellers and buyers in international trade contracts. Incoterms specify who is responsible for shipping, insurance, customs duties, and risk at each stage of the transaction.
For B2B food businesses, choosing the right Incoterm can mean the difference between a seamless transaction and costly misunderstandings. Whether you're dealing in bulk grains, frozen food, specialty ingredients, or processed products, using the correct Incoterm ensures clarity in cost distribution, delivery obligations, and legal responsibilities.
Incoterms are a globally recognized set of trade terms that define the roles and obligations of buyers and sellers in international transactions. The latest version, Incoterms 2020, includes 11 terms that govern the transfer of risk, cost, and responsibility for transportation.
Since their introduction in 1936, Incoterms have been periodically updated to reflect changes in global trade. The most recent version, Incoterms 2020, clarifies responsibilities in international transactions, making it easier for food businesses to navigate trade logistics. The full details and official rules can be found on the ICC's official website.
According to the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Incoterms 2020, there are 11 Incoterms that define the responsibilities of buyers and sellers in international trade. These Incoterms are categorized into two groups:
In the B2B food industry, Incoterms are particularly important because they:
A poorly chosen Incoterm can result in unexpected costs, delays, and potential product spoilage, making it crucial for food businesses to select terms that align with their shipping and logistics strategies.
When selecting an Incoterm, food businesses should consider:
For example, a European distributor sourcing organic cocoa from Africa might prefer CIF to ensure the shipment is insured and delivered to their local port, whereas a bulk rice exporter from Asia might opt for FOB to manage their risk.
Selecting the wrong Incoterm can lead to costly errors, shipment delays, and unnecessary risks. One of the most common mistakes is choosing an unsuitable Incoterm for perishable products. For example, relying on terms such as EXW (Ex Works) or FOB (Free on Board) without considering the logistics required for temperature-sensitive food products can expose shipments to extended risk. If the buyer lacks control over refrigerated transport, the goods may spoil before reaching their destination.
Another frequent issue is misunderstanding cost responsibilities between the buyer and seller. Some businesses fail to calculate additional expenses such as import duties, insurance, or inland transport, leading to unexpected financial burdens. For example, a buyer agreeing to a CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight) contract might assume all costs are covered, only to realize upon arrival that local port handling and import duties remain their responsibility.
Failing to secure proper insurance coverage is another mistake, particularly when using CIF. Although CIF requires the seller to provide insurance, the minimum coverage may not be sufficient for high-value or fragile food products. Buyers should always clarify insurance terms and consider additional coverage for protection against unforeseen incidents such as damage or contamination during transit.
Lastly, ignoring country-specific customs regulations can result in clearance delays, penalties, or even shipment rejection. Some countries have strict import regulations for food safety, labeling, and certification, and selecting an Incoterm without considering these requirements can disrupt trade operations. To avoid this, businesses must ensure their chosen Incoterm aligns with the destination country's regulatory framework and import procedures.